Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > General Antitrust

Market Definition: Impossible and Counterproductive

Louis Kaplow, Antitrust Law Journal , Vol. 79, No. 1, 2014

See Louis Kaplow's resume

Click here to read the full article online

In recent articles, I have advanced a number of criticisms of the market definition/redefinition paradigm, chief among them that market definition is impossible and counterproductive. First, there is no valid way to infer market power from market shares in redefined (non-homogeneous-goods) markets. Second, one cannot choose which market definition is superior without already having in hand one’s best estimate of market power, rendering the exercise pointless. Worse, market power inferences in the chosen market are inferior to the best estimate with which one began. After elaborating these points, this Essay applies them to the three main settings in which the hypothetical monopolist test is employed in various jurisdictions’ merger guidelines, showing this test to be counterproductive in every instance. Finally, it addresses reasons that some are nevertheless reluctant to abandon market definition altogether.

© 2017 - Institute of Competition Law Download our brochure