Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Academic Articles Awards > General Antitrust

What Consensus? Why Ideology and Elections Still Matter to Antitrust

Steven Salop, 79(2) Antitrust Law Journal 601, 2014

See Steven C. Salop's resume

Click here to read the full article online

This article discusses the role of ideology and politics in antitrust enforcement and the impact of elections in the last twenty year on enforcement and policy at the federal antitrust agencies. The article explains the differences in antitrust ideologies and their impact on policy preferences. The article then uses a database of civil non-merger complaints by the DOJ and FTC over the last three Presidential administrations to analyze changes in the number, type and other characteristics of antitrust enforcement. It also discusses change in vertical merger enforcement and other antirust policies such as amicus briefs, reports and guidelines. The article concludes that elections do matter and that the impact of elections on the DOJ and FTC has differed significantly.

© 2017 - Institute of Competition Law Download our brochure