Previous business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Concerted Practices

10 Comments on the ECJ’s Judgment in Case C-67/13 P, Groupement des Cartes Bancaires

Alfonso Lamadrid de Pablo and Pablo Ibáñez Colomo, Chillin’Competition (Blog), September 2014

See Pablo Ibáñez Colomo's resume See Alfonso Lamadrid de Pablo's resume

Click here to read the full article online

September 11 2014 was a big day for antitrust at the European Court of Justice. The Court delivered two important Judgments in the Mastercard and Cartes Bancaires cases, and heard oral arguments in Huawei/ZTE. We’ll comment on the latter in due course, and will be devoting our next posts to discussing the content and implications of the two Judgments. Let’s start with Cartes Bancaires, which is the one with greater potential future implications (as already noted by Pablo in the post below).

This can be an analytically complex subject and there’s much to discuss, so allow me to skip the basics and the summary of the Judgment that you can find here (a copy-pasted version will also appear in some newsletters…) Here are my 10 initial reactions to the Judgment. These are not at all definitive positions but rather preliminary thoughts that I’m hastily posting now with the hope that I’ll be able to polish them in the course of follow-up discussions. For the lazy ones, and given that the full text may be lengthy and dense (for a change), all the main messages appear in bold.

© 2017 - Institute of Competition Law Download our brochure