Previous business/academic article Next business/academic article
Business Articles Awards > Mergers

Reasonable Best Efforts: Cold Comfort to Sellers

Peter Lyons, Beau Buffier, Tammara Fort, and Matthew Jennejohn, The M&A Lawyer, Vol. 18, Issue 1, January 2014

See Beau Buffier's resume See Peter Lyons's resume See Tammara Fort's resume See Matthew Jennejohn's resume

Click here to read the full article online

The article examines a preliminary bench ruling from the Delaware Chancery Court in the matter of Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. Apollo (Mauritius) Holdings Pvt. Ltd., et al, which refused Cooper Tire’s assertion that Apollo has failed to use its reasonable best efforts to complete negotiations with Cooper Tire’s labor union and close their then-pending merger. According to the authors, the case “provides a rare Delaware court interpretation of the actions required to satisfy the “reasonable best efforts” standard that has become commonplace in antitrust covenants in merger agreements.” They add that, based on Cooper, “a reasonable best efforts standard alone provides cold comfort to sellers seeking deal certainty in circumstances where there is a meaningful likelihood that the antitrust authorities will require economic concessions in order to approve a transaction.” In the end, according to the authors, the lesson of Cooper is clear: “if a strategic buyer comes offering assurances of reasonable best efforts without any specifics, let the seller beware.”

© 2017 - Institute of Competition Law Download our brochure